Progressive Black | The Interceptor | Microsoft Office 2016 MacOSX 21 43 0 VL + Crack

Derivation and definition of the Debye length

All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
  Debye Length Adrian Down January 22, 2007 1 Particle number density 1.1 Review Previously, we used Boltzmann’s law to express the number density n of a species of particle in thermal equilibrium subject to a potential φ, n(r) = n 0 e − qφ(r) kT In the quasi-nuetral situtaion, the number of ions n i and electrons n e are approximately equal, n i ≈ n e ≈ n 0 . However, the distribution of these different kinds of particles ar
  Debye Length Adrian DownJanuary 22, 2007 1 Particle number density 1.1 Review Previously, we used Boltzmann’s law to express the number density n of aspecies of particle in thermal equilibrium subject to a potential φ , n ( r ) = n 0 e − qφ ( r ) kT  In the quasi-nuetral situtaion, the number of ions n i and electrons n e areapproximately equal, n i ≈ n e ≈ n 0 . However, the distribution of thesedifferent kinds of particles are not necessarily unifrom in space in the quasi-neutral situtation, and so charge gradients and fields can still exist withinthe plasma. 1.2 Example: Gaussian potential Consider a Gaussian potential φ acting on a population of electrons. In thiscase, the charge is q = − e . The distribution of electrons is thus, n e ( r ) = n 0 e + eφkT  The sign of the exponent indicates that there is an enhancement of the num-ber of electrons in the region of the potential. This can be seen physicallyfrom the electric field, which is the gradient of the potential. In all space,the electric field points outwards from the peak of the potential, so the elec-trons, having negative charge, are drawn towards the potential, opposite of the electric field.1  2 Derivation and definition of the Debye length 2.1 Poisson’s equation The previous example is not very physical. As soon as the distribution startsto evolve, the change in the density n changes the potential φ . To find thepotential, we need Poisson’s equation, φ · E = ρ 0 E = −  φ ⇒− 2 φ = ρ 0 ρ is the charge density, which must take into account all species of particle.Assuming the charge of the electrons and ions to be equal and opposite, ρ =  s n s q s = n i e − n e e If  n e and n i are equal and uniform, then there is complete cancellation. Ingeneral though, this is not the case. Note. In an inhomogenious medium, a tensor must be used to represent theproperties of the dielectric,  ·←→  · E      D = ρ 0 2.2 Introduction of a test charge We can consider a test change s placed in the plasma. Using the expressionsfor the number density derived previously to express the number density, ρ = n i e − n e e + s = en 0  e − eφkT i − e eφkT e  + s Note. We allow for the case that T  e  = T  i .In the one-dimensional case, Poisson’s equation with the inclusion of thetest charge is, − ∂  2 φ ( x ) ∂x 2 = n 0 e 0  e − eφ ( x ) kT i − e eφ ( x ) kT e  + s 2  2.3 Linearization Finding an analytic solution to this equation is nontrivial. The physicalsolution is to make an approximation and solve the equation in the resultinglimit. To linearize the equation, make the approximation that eφkT   1, sothat the exponents can be expanded. This approximation corresponds to kT   eφ , meaning that most particles in the plasma are “free-streaming”,unaffected by the potential φ .For small x , the exponential can be Taylor expanded, e x ≈ 1 + x x  1 ⇒ e − eφkT i ≈ 1 − eφkT  i e eφkT e ≈ 1 + eφkT  e The linearize form of Poisson’s equation is, − ∂  2 φ∂x 2 = n 0 e 0  1 − eφkT  i − 1 − eφkT  e  + s = n 0 e 2  0  1 kT  i +1 kT  i  φ + s The coefficient of the φ term can be considered a constant. By comparingwith the left side, it must have units of length squared. The Debye length isdefined as the square root of this constant. We can simplify the expressionfurther by defining an effective temperature,1 T  eff  =1 T  e +1 T  i The Debye length is then, Definition (Debye length λ D ) . λ D =    0 kT  eff  n 0 e 2 Note. In convenient units, the Debye length can be written, λ D = 7 . 4   T  (eV) n (cm − 3 )m3  3 Interpretation of  λ D : shielding 3.1 Introduction Shielding in a plasma is often due primarily to the electrons in the plasma.Consider electrons impinging on a surface. The flux of these electrons is φ = nv th . The thermal velocity can be approximated by kinetic theory,modulo a constant factor, kT  ∼ m  v 2  ⇒ v th ∼   kT m Because of the dependance on the mass, the thermal velocity of the heav-ier ions is often much less than that of the electrons. Hence if there is a wallin a container, the flux of electrons onto that wall will often be much higherthan that of ions. The accumulation of negative charge will form a sheath.This effect is known as sheath theory, and it is presented in chapter 8 of thetext. 3.2 Differential equations 3.2.1 Possion’s equation Poisson’s equation governs the formation and evolution of such a sheath of charge, ∂  2 φ∂x 2 =1 λ 2 D φ + s The presence of the constant factor s does not change that the solution tothis equation is exponential, φ ( x ) = Ae | x | λD + Be −| x | λD where A and B are normalization constants. As a boundary condition, werequire that φ → 0 as x →∞ , so A = 0. 3.2.2 Electric field We can obtain an expression for the potential φ from the electric field E . Todo so, we assume that the test charge is actually a sheet that is infinite in4
Related Search
Similar documents
View more
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks